Unpacking Beijing’s Narrative on Taiwan
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy
- Shaping economic rules, technology standards, and political institutions have been the core pillars of Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s efforts to advance his authoritarian model and weaken democratic processes and governance. Beijing’s priority remains to shape the international discourse to its advantage and promote “democracy that works”. A “battle of narratives” has emerged whereby China continues to challenge and undermine democracy, the rule of law, and human rights, values that Taiwan has committed to pursuing in its own development.
- In its relations with third countries, Beijing has imposed its One China principle, falsely asserting that the world had signed up to the claim that there is only “One China” and Taiwan is part of it. Recently Beijing has also ramped up political and military pressure on Taiwan, seeking to further shrink its international space.
- The EU has its own One China policy, in light of which member-states recognize the PRC as the sole legal government of China and maintain economic and cultural ties with Taiwan. The recent rhetorical alignment between Beijing and Moscow in light of Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine has increased the sense of urgency in the EU to strengthen its resilience in close cooperation with like-minded partners.
- Maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific is in the interest of the EU, Taiwan, and the PRC. Yet, convergence that benefits all stakeholders looks highly unlikely. At the same time, the complexity in these ties will likely increase rather than decrease, further challenging the work of policy-makers who follow developments in the region.
- Beijing’s intimidation, pressure, and coercive measures have wider implications beyond Taiwan; they challenge democratic governance as a political system. For an effective EU response, understanding these complexities is more urgent than ever.
- The EU, and democracies in general, must enhance public awareness of the complex reality of Taiwan’s relations with the PRC, including Beijing’s instrumentalization of its One China principle to undermine democracies’ sovereign right to cooperate with Taiwan.
- The EU remains reactive in countering Beijing’s discourse; it must better explain its One China policy and help to counter the false narrative that distorts its own stance on Taiwan.
- The EU’s approach to Taiwan has to adapt to the changing reality. It must be proactive and avoid adopting Beijing’s language, especially concerning the One China principle.
- Taiwan must address the China challenge with a whole-of-society approach involving the government, civil society organizations, and social media platforms. The EU and Taiwan must work closely together to address common challenges.
Slowly Taking Off: Nordic-Taiwan Relations
Taiwan has in recent years attracted increasing attention all over the world. It has become the focal point of conflict in the U.S.-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific and has also […]
Taiwan and the Diplomatic Squeeze
In mid-March 2023, the self-governing island of Taiwan lost another one of its already few diplomatic allies. Announcing the severing of diplomatic ties between Taiwan and Honduras on Twitter on March 15, […]
India in a world of asymmetrical multipolarity
In the past decade, the world has gathered an irreversible momentum in global geopolitical transitions, including the fragmentation and reconfiguration of the international order. This is largely due to the […]
ASEAN’s Evolving Alignment Strategy in the South China Sea: Between Middle and Major Power Dynamics
ASEAN is a region of vital strategic importance where the United States’ Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) collide. To avert geopolitical uncertainty and to avoid being […]
Drivers of U.S.-China Strategic Competition: Understanding the Chinese Perspective
The relationship between the United States and China is one of the world’s most important and mutually beneficial bilateral relationships. Nonetheless, it is also complex and contentious, with both countries […]
Quad Plus EU: A Viable Option for the Times?
Today, the primary Indo-Pacific contest is not just about the China-US hegemony. It also involves a range of so-called “middle powers” – including Australia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, […]